Close
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 25
  1. #1
    Member Kit's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Location
    Western-Europe
    Age
    22
    Posts
    771



    "daygaming women" ever heard of it?

    Someone at some pua facebookgroup I follow linked this:

    http://news.dose.com/entertainment/2...m_campaign=mak

    It is almost hilarious in the sense that I absolutely know what she felt like..

    I mean.. I had similar thoughts in the metro in london...

    However.. I did open a guy and he was positive. Unfortunately I just had to get out at the next stop haha

    anyway, my Q to you: have you seen more stories/blogs/ other things like this?

    if so.. link! I am curious

    edit: googled the girl..
    simply LOL

    https://vine.co/v/eejmie0uBjW

  2. #2



    haha I got daygamed a couple times by girls.

    the last one I vividly remember was a 9/10 latvian girl. she was heavily drugged/alcohol'd out from the night before from some trance event
    she number closed me on a sunday afternoon but then later forgot or acted to forget who I was.

    she got right in my face and commented on the weather. little did she know I'm a seasoned player, so I quickly took control lol.

    sad times lol

    I'm started to find that women's sexuality is very similar to men's but societal program is brutal on them. for instance one girl I pulled on tinder actually told me that she loved sexuality and was actually swiping on tinder while we were chilling (I give a very non-judgemental vibe)

  3. #3
    Member hangman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Malgudi
    Age
    37
    Posts
    2,933


    This post has been ranked 10.00 out of 10 with 1 votes.

    Quote Originally Posted by Jack Gignac View Post
    I'm started to find that women's sexuality is very similar to men's but societal program is brutal on them. for instance one girl I pulled on tinder actually told me that she loved sexuality and was actually swiping on tinder while we were chilling (I give a very non-judgemental vibe)
    Natural vs Social programming, is beyond a point a pua-manufactured red herring, i think. Society is a result of the biology of our species interacting with itself. I was banging a French chick in India sometime ago, and she used to stay in a hostel full of indian girls, and she told me that she wouldn't be surprised if some (many?) of those Indian girls truly and genuinely were asexual. I believe her. Such is the power of social programming. It can blur reality.

    I have a what-is and what-is-not view on female behavior, not so much about whether that behavior is natural or socially programmed. (Except some when it is useful for frame control)

    Men-vs-women's sexuality is an interesting topic and i dont agree they are the same. Here are some differences: Needy guys turn off women exponentially more than needy women turn off dudes (at least for ONS and bail). Also, variety in their partners is a motivation in itself for guys, but its often such a low-level challenge for women. Note that im not saying women can't be promiscuous, but their prime-mover seems different. MM works on women, to the point of creating an addiction in them, but i have a hard time imagining that roles reversed, it would work on me even remotely as well. Some bits, yes, but not to the extent and degree. (lack of) validation is a huge ingredient of female sexuality, but not for men, i dont think. Also i think on an average sex is better for guys than women, but when a woman finally gets fucked by a guy that she craves getting fucked by, her experience of sex is way more intense than that of any guys'. I think chicks are okay with being cheated on more than guys are. That makes evolutionary sense to me, and most of my girls turn a blind eye to my horndog ways, because i am nice to them and fuck them ok.

  4. #4
    Member Circulator's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Location
    USA
    Age
    37
    Posts
    201



    Quote Originally Posted by hangman View Post
    Natural vs Social programming, is beyond a point a pua-manufactured red herring, i think. Society is a result of the biology of our species interacting with itself. I was banging a French chick in India sometime ago, and she used to stay in a hostel full of indian girls, and she told me that she wouldn't be surprised if some (many?) of those Indian girls truly and genuinely were asexual. I believe her. Such is the power of social programming.
    This is confusing. Are you suggesting that Indians are biologically less sexual, hence a reflection in Indian society? The second sentence of the above quote seems to thusly imply such.

  5. #5


    This post has been ranked 10.00 out of 10 with 1 votes.

    I can only truly speak for myself hangman, but I don't really give a fuck if a girl is non-sexually monogamous towards me
    and I actually do get turned off when a woman is needy. there are girls who I was going to add to my rotation but because of their neediness I opt out.

    a lot of quote unquote female sexuality is because they're conditioned to be passive and because of that men become sellers. as buyers their going to experience insane abundance which leads to their said behaviour. I probably have the same abundance that women do now so my behaviour becomes more similar to a girls sexuality.

    jeffy was alluding to the same thing, that the better you become at game, the more you become like a girl lol

    there definitely is a more biological part to it as well though. indians are genetically less promiscuous, it's shown by their smaller penis size average, and successful marriage rate.

    congo for example is almost the opposite, extremely large 7 inch average penis size, rape is commonplace, tons of kids out of wedlock etc

  6. #6
    Member Impulse's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Western Europe
    Posts
    1,795


    This post has been ranked 1.00 out of 10 with 1 votes.

    Indians are less promiscuous because the society in the subcontinent makes people asexual.

    For example, India is full of hardcore religious areas, poverty stricken tribal societies and so on

    India is a country with a heck of a lot of social, economic and cultural problems

    -----

    That said, Indian diet makes people more horny. Many of the indian cuisine spices acts as aphoridisiacs and increase libido.

    Its no accident that Indians tend to have larger families (due in part from lack of contraception) but also because they can't stop fucking when they do.

    See here about the spices:

    http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/l...ow/9297457.cms

    and

    http://www.ayushveda.com/top-8-spice...men-and-women/

    -----------

    Last thing: Indian women in the West are generally way more promiscuous...if they have a western outlook or grew up in the West they will be more promiscious and open minded about these things

  7. #7
    Member hangman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Malgudi
    Age
    37
    Posts
    2,933


    This post has been ranked 10.00 out of 10 with 1 votes.

    On the phone, so responses in bold...

    Quote Originally Posted by Jack Gignac View Post
    I can only truly speak for myself hangman, but I don't really give a fuck if a girl is non-sexually monogamous towards me
    and I actually do get turned off when a woman is needy. there are girls who I was going to add to my rotation but because of their neediness I opt out.

    Neediness turns off women even in ONS situations. But even guys with options would be happy to bang and bail on a clinger, if she is hot. And your claim is consistent with that. I said bang and bail, not get her into rotation.

    a lot of quote unquote female sexuality is because they're conditioned to be passive and because of that men become sellers. as buyers their going to experience insane abundance which leads to their said behaviour. I probably have the same abundance that women do now so my behaviour becomes more similar to a girls sexuality.

    Have you ever gone out clubbing with hot girls who claim to be horny and sexually frustrared and looking to get laid? In some cases, even with all that, they will go back home alone. They might even kiss a couple of guys, but it is crazy how quickly they get turned off because the guy gets super-into it and wants it more than her. Neediness or not being a challenge is a MASSIVE attraction killer for women. I dont think women often know this consciously, but they experience it.

    This is simply not the reality of any guy i have ever known. Guys who are horny, dont hold themselves to some exalted standard, they go bang some reasonably bang-able club chick, to get it out of theur system. Hot chicks can sometimes go for months without getting laid, because most guys just dont do it for them. Are all women like this? Of course not. But the point is, NO guy with options is like this.



    jeffy was alluding to the same thing, that the better you become at game, the more you become like a girl lol

    Not a big fan of appeals to authority, but i highly doubt jeffy is talking across the board. Post a link, if you want. I generally agree with most of his opinions when i have heard them, he is no proponent of no-game-game bullshit. So i suspect it is not as black&white as you are suggesting.

    there definitely is a more biological part to it as well though. indians are genetically less promiscuous, it's shown by their smaller penis size average, and successful marriage rate.

    congo for example is almost the opposite, extremely large 7 inch average penis size, rape is commonplace, tons of kids out of wedlock etc

    Sorry dude, im going to go with economic/political stabiliry as the most straightforward cause of violence in a country, not some bro-science about penis-size and whatnot lol

  8. #8
    Member hangman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Malgudi
    Age
    37
    Posts
    2,933


    This post has been ranked 7.00 out of 10 with 3 votes.

    Quote Originally Posted by Circulator View Post
    This is confusing. Are you suggesting that Indians are biologically less sexual, hence a reflection in Indian society? The second sentence of the above quote seems to thusly imply such.
    Im saying that the line between biology and sociology is blurry in these things. They feed back on each other and it is not too meaningful to distinguish them. Eg: if you measured testosterone levels of these chicks, it will pbbly be lower. Whether that came first or whether the brainwashing made it happen is anyone's guess.

    Another eg: Girls getting attracted to you because of social proof. Is that biology or sociology?

    Explanations are largely irrelevant, it is observations that matter in PU. Social proof can get you laid, old school indian chicks are hard to bang. Those are observations and therefore meaningful. Whether it is a result of biology or society is not always a distinction that can be meaningfully made.

    To say that women are like men sexually is BS because any guy who has talked to girls knows they are wired differently for whatever reason. Thats it. Heck, thats why this forum exists, ffs! Mental masturbation gymnastics about natural vs social programming and why that difference is not real, is ultimately meaningless. Just as much as the adamant claims by some nutty feminists that men and women are same except for social prigramming.

    It is fine for men and women to be dufferent, it doesn't mean better or worse, which is good because thats the truth. Sorry about typos, im writing this in public transport.

  9. #9


    This post has been ranked 5.00 out of 10 with 1 votes.

    penis size isn't bro-science.

    read sex at dawn.

    penis size is correlation to promiscuity because it plunges another man's seamin out, it's a direct correlate to promiscuity, and denying it is almost as absurd as being a creatinist.

    regardless. you probably know a lot of shit I don't know and I probably know a lot of shit that you don't know. so whatever, that's why we're here.

  10. #10



    Quote Originally Posted by hangman View Post
    Im saying that the line between biology and sociology is blurry in these things. They feed back on each other and it is not too meaningful to distinguish them. Eg: if you measured testosterone levels of these chicks, it will pbbly be lower. Whether that came first or whether the brainwashing made it happen is anyone's guess.

    Another eg: Girls getting attracted to you because of social proof. Is that biology or sociology?

    Explanations are largely irrelevant, it is observations that matter in PU. Social proof can get you laid, old school indian chicks are hard to bang. Those are observations and therefore meaningful. Whether it is a result of biology or society is not always a distinction that can be meaningfully made.

    To say that women are like men sexually is BS because any guy who has talked to girls knows they are wired differently for whatever reason. Thats it. Heck, thats why this forum exists, ffs! Mental masturbation gymnastics about natural vs social programming and why that difference is not real, is ultimately meaningless. Just as much as the adamant claims by some nutty feminists that men and women are same except for social prigramming.

    It is fine for men and women to be dufferent, it doesn't mean better or worse, which is good because thats the truth. Sorry about typos, im writing this in public transport.
    yeah that's true. it's a chicken or egg kinda thing.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •